Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Voth v. Steward
as 23-13
Petitioner: FRANK E. VOTH
Respondent: HEIDI STEWARD, ACTING DIRECTOR
Frank Voth v. Amisberry, et al
as 17-35318
Plaintiff - Appellant: FRANK E. VOTH
Defendant - Appellee: AMISBERRY, Superintendent, T. RIDLEY, Assistant Superintendent, N. MONTOYA and others
Voth v. Amisberry et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv02200
Defendant: Amisberry, Boston, D. Duwelius and others
Plaintiff: Frank E. Voth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Voth v. Premo
as 6:2016cv01019
Respondent: Jeff Premo
Petitioner: Frank E. Voth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Voth v. Laney et al
as 6:2016cv00779
Defendant: Ms. C. Archdeacon, Garrett Laney and Captain Simmons
Plaintiff: Frank E. Voth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Voth v. Simmons et al
as 6:2016cv00608
Defendant: Ms. C. Archdeacon, Mr. G. Laney and Captain Simmons
Plaintiff: Frank E. Voth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Voth v. Nooth et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv01855
Defendant: Cpl. Bammer, Lt. King, Mark Nooth and others
Plaintiff: Frank E. Voth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Voth v. Premo et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2014cv00128
Defendant: Ms. Coffy, Jane/John Doe 1 Through 8, Captain Long and others
Plaintiff: Frank E. Voth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frank Voth v. R. Coursey, et al
as 13-35397
Plaintiff - Appellant: FRANK E. VOTH
Defendant - Appellee: R. COURSEY, DAVE POWELL, NACY TAYLOR and others
Voth v. Hatfield et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2013cv00575
Defendant: Wendy Hatfield, Emly Hudgins, Officer Parnell and others
Plaintiff: Frank E. Voth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?