Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Maria Ferreyra v. Carolyn W. Colvin
as 5:2013cv02179
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Maria Ferreyra
Jose Rodriguez-Ferreyra v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-73721
Petitioner:
JOSE JUVENAL RODRIGUEZ-FERREYRA
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Wilfrido Ferreyra -v-R.P. Coating, Inc., et.al..
as 5:2013cv04754
Plaintiff:
Wilfrido Ferreyra
Defendant:
R. P. COATINGS, INC. , PROTECTIVE COATING SYSTEMS, INC. , RONALD BRUCE NEMETH and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Maria Mendoza-Ferreyra v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-70600
Petitioner:
MARIA VICTORIA MENDOZA-FERREYRA
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Acosta-Rivas et al. v Hines Growers, LLC
as 3:2011cv01248
Plaintiff:
Avelino Acosta-Rivas, Jose L. Acosta-Rivas, Ponciano Andrade-Arroyo and others
Defendant:
Hines Growers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2101 -2104 (WARN) Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification
Maria Mendoza Ferreyra v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 10-72248
Petitioner:
MARIA VICTORIA MENDOZA FERREYRA
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Ferreyra
as 2:2009cv01572
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Francisco Javier Ferreyra
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Ferreyra et al
as 2:2009cv01227
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Francisco Javier Ferreyra, Roberto C. Ramirez and Jazz Wave Entertainment, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 Unauthorized Reception of Cable Service
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Ferreyra et al
as 2:2009at00702
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Francisco Javier Ferreyra, Roberto C. Ramirez and Jazz Wave Entertainment, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Maria Mendoza Ferreyra v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 09-70944
Petitioner:
MARIA VICTORIA MENDOZA FERREYRA
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
