Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Chatman v. Frazier et al
as 2:2013cv01605
Plaintiff:
Charles Chatman
Defendant:
D. Frazier, D. Swingle, B. J. Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne v. Cate et al
as 2:2012cv00243
Plaintiff:
Myron A. Payne
Defendant:
Matthew Cate, James E. Tilton, Tom Felker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chappell v. Fleming et al
as 2:2012cv00234
Plaintiff:
Rex Chappell
Defendant:
B. Fleming, G. Brackett, W. Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalez v. Cate et al
as 2:2011cv03196
Plaintiff:
Jose Gonzalez, Jr.
Defendant:
Matthew Cate, Mike McDonald, R. L. Gower and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chatman v. Medina
as 2:2011cv00681
Plaintiff:
Charles James Chatman
Defendant:
David M. Medina, D. Swingle, J. Nepomuceno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Charles, Sr. v. James Tilton, et al
as 09-17258
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM HENRY CHARLES, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES E. TILTON, MIKE MCDONALD, R. L. GOWER and others
Payne v. Brackett et al
as 2:2009cv02727
Plaintiff:
Myron Atrice Payne
Defendant:
G. Brackett, M. Runnels, S. Armoskus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Payne v. Brackett et al
as 1:2009cv01594
Plaintiff:
Myron Atrice Payne
Defendant:
G. Brackett, M. Runnels, S. Armoskus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles v. Tilton, et al
as 2:2009cv01051
Plaintiff:
William Henry Charles, Sr.
Defendant:
James Tilton, Mike McDonald, R. L. Gower and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Marvin Hollis v. USDC-CAN, et al
as 09-70426
:
In re: MARVIN G. HOLLIS
Petitioner:
MARVIN G. HOLLIS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO and UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Real Party In Interest:
R. VILLANUEUS, Correctional Officer and G. BRACKETT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
