Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Vanorden et al v. ECP Optometry Services LLC et al
as 2:2024cv01060
Plaintiff:
Jodeci Vanorden and Gabriella Gantt
Defendant:
ECP Optometry Services LLC and Eyecare Partners LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Roberts, et al. v. Inslee, et al.
as 24-1949
Plaintiff:
JANE ELIZABETH ROBERTS, JON ALLEMAN, MICHELLE ANDREWS and others
Defendant:
JAY INSLEE, GOVERNOR, SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN SPOKANE, SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN, INC. and others
Gantt et al v. Director of FBI
as 1:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Paul Gantt and Edna Gantt
Defendant:
Director of FBI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Gantt et al v. Bilcich et al
as 1:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Paul Gantt and Edna Gantt
Defendant:
Mr. Eric Bilcich and Mrs. Bilcich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Gantt et al v. Penny Mac et al
as 1:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Paul Gantt and Edna Gantt
Defendant:
Penny Mac and David Spector
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Gantt et al v. Watanabe
as 1:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Paul Gantt and Edna Gantt
Defendant:
Judge Cathleen N.A. Watanabe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Gantt et al v. Legacy Mortgage et al
as 1:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
Paul Gantt and Edna Gantt
Defendant:
Legacy Mortgage and Joe King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Gantt et al v. Dimon
as 1:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Paul Gantt and Edna Gantt
Defendant:
Mr. J. Dimon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Gantt et al v. Penny Mac Corp et al
as 1:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Paul Gantt and Edna Gantt
Defendant:
Penny Mac Corp, Cades Schutte LLP, Patricia J. McHenry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Gantt et al v. TMLF Hawaii LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Paul Gantt and Edna Gantt
Defendant:
TMLF Hawaii LLC and Peter Stone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
