Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv04725
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv02892
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Rincon et al v. West Coast Tomato Growers, LLC et al
as 3:2013cv02473
Plaintiff:
Serafin Rincon and Santiago Bautusta
Defendant:
West Coast Tomato Growers, LLC , Harry Singh & Sons, LLC and Does 1-20, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1801
Pandolfo et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv03100
Plaintiff:
Frank Pandolfo , Victor Manuel Pargas , Zaida M Parker and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012at00071
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00145
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Charles Glass et al v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
as 2:2008cv01835
Plaintiff:
Charles Glass and Charles Glass
Cross Claimant:
Harry Singh & Sons Farming Partnership, L.P., Harry Singh & Sons Farming Partnership, L.P. and Harry Singh & Sons Farming Partnership, L.P.
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation, BNSF Railway Company and DOES
Cross Defendant:
The United States of America, - and ROES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Sandu et al v. Melville
as 3:2007cv05359
Plaintiff:
Harry Singh Sandu and Sharanjit Kaur
Defendant:
Rosemary Melville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
