Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Lane v. JUUL LABS, INC. et al
as 3:2022cv00412
Plaintiff:
Alyssa Lane
Defendant:
JUUL LABS, INC., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Putnam v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv09438
Plaintiff:
Jacob Putnam
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc. formerly doing business as PAX Labs, Inc. formerly doing business as Ploom Inc., Altria Group, Inc,, Philip Morris USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Proctor v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00729
Defendant:
Eby-Brown Company, LLC, James Monsees, Altria Enterprises LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Leah Proctor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
B.C., a Minor, by Tara Dye, Her Mother and Next Friend v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv02375
Defendant:
MOTHER MURPHY'S LABS, INC, EBY-BROWN COMPANY, LLC, JAMES MONSEES and others
Plaintiff:
B.C., a Minor, by Tara Dye, Her Mother and Next Friend
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coffield v. JuuL Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv02377
Defendant:
PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC, MOTHER MURPHY'S LABS, INC, JAMES MONSEES and others
Plaintiff:
PARKER COFFIELD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ferguson v. Juul Labs, Inc et al
as 3:2020cv02379
Defendant:
PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC, MOTHER MURPHY'S LABS, INC, JAMES MONSEES and others
Plaintiff:
KELSEY FERGUSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Duane Bowen v. City of Murrieta, et al
as 18-55195
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DUANE JAMES BOWEN
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF MURRIETA, WHIDDON, Detective and VAZQUEZ, Officer
Duane James Bowen v. Mr. Whiddon
as 5:2017cv00785
Plaintiff:
Duane James Bowen
Defendant:
City of Murrieta, Detective Whiddon, Officer Vazquez and others
Duane James Bowen et al v. The People State of California et al
as 5:2017cv00691
Petitioner:
Duane James Bowen
Respondent:
DPD Richard Briones-Colman, District Attorney Case, Mr Michael A Hestrin and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
