Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Patterson v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al
as 2:2023cv00539
Plaintiff:
Kelly Patterson
Defendant:
Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, City of Las Vegas, Officer S Salazar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brian Ballentine, et al v. Christopher Tucker, et al
as 20-16805
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KELLY PATTERSON, BRIAN BALLENTINE and CATALINO DAZO
Plaintiff:
GAIL SACCO
Defendant:
MIKE WALLACE, Sergeant, LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and JOHN LIBERTY, Lieutenant
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER T. TUCKER, Detective
Kelly Patterson v. Richard Fonbuena, et al
as 19-16632
Defendant / Appellant:
RICHARD FONBUENA, Badge No. 6834
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KELLY PATTERSON
Defendant:
LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
Patterson v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department
as 2:2018cv00518
Defendant:
Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department
Plaintiff:
Kelly Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brian Ballentine, et al v. LVMPD, et al
as 17-16749
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN BALLENTINE, CATALINO DAZO, KELLY PATTERSON and others
Defendant:
LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, MIKE WALLACE, Sergeant and JOHN LIBERTY, Lieutenant
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER T. TUCKER, Detective
Brian Ballentine, et al v. LVMPD, et al
as 17-16728
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BRIAN BALLENTINE, CATALINO DAZO, KELLY PATTERSON and others
Defendant:
LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, MIKE WALLACE, Sergeant and JOHN LIBERTY, Lieutenant
Defendant - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER T. TUCKER, Detective
Ballentine et al v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al
as 2:2014cv01584
Plaintiff:
Brian Ballentine, Catalino Dazo, Kelly Patterson and others
Defendant:
Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Lieutenant John Liberty, Detective Christopher T. Tucker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
