Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Barron v. Deboo We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00639
Petitioner: James Roy Barron, Jr
Respondent: Kuma J. Deboo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wayne Simpson v. Kuma Deboo, et al
as 10-15423
Petitioner - Appellant: WAYNE SIMPSON
Respondent - Appellee: KUMA J. DEBOO, Warden and RICHARD B. IVES
Denny v. Deboo We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv02070
Petitioner: Eric Denny
Respondent: Kuma J. Deboo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Rodney Skurdal v. Kuma Deboo
as 08-16695
Petitioner - Appellant: RODNEY OWEN SKURDAL
Respondent - Appellee: KUMA J DEBOO
Marcus Timmons v. USDC-CES
as 08-72344
: In re: MARCUS CHRISTOPHER TIMMONS
Petitioner: MARCUS CHRISTOPHER TIMMONS
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Real Party In Interest: RICHARD B. IVES, ROBERT E MCFADDEN, HARLEY G. LAPPIN and others
Charles Hinshaw v. John Hardcastle, et al
as 08-15987
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHARLES ARTHUR HINSHAW
Defendant - Appellee: JOHN B HARDCASTLE, DAVID A GLOCKNER and KUMA J DEBOO
Timmons v. Ives, et al
as 2:2008cv00422
Petitioner: Marcus Christopher Timmons
Respondent: Richard B. Ives, Robert E. McFadden, Harley G. Lappin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Butler v. Deboo
as 2:2007cv02598
Petitioner: Joelen Tyrice Butler
Respondent: Kuma J. Deboo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Lee v. Deboo et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv02255
Petitioner: Gregory W. Lee
Respondent: Kuma J. Deboo, Robert E. McFadden, Harley G. Lappin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Cutrer v. Deboo
as 2:2007cv01533
Petitioner: Michael Cutrer
Defendant: Kuma J. Deboo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?