Cases 1 - 10 of 485
Matlock et al v. Singh, et al
as 6:2024cv01835
Defendant:
Amarjit Singh and JP Carrier, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Brittany Miller and Dustin Matlock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Carmichael v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2024cv01838
Defendant:
Jamie Miller, Corey Fhuere, Oregon Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Darren Carmichael
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wade v. Miller et al
as 2:2024cv01474
Defendant:
John Doe, Officer Trimble, Jamie Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Cortez Wade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01774
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Yoder v. Miller
as 2:2024cv01742
Petitioner:
Gary Dean Yoder
Respondent:
Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Felix-Puac v. Miller
as 2:2024cv01400
Petitioner:
Alejandro Santos Felix-Puac
Respondent:
Jaime Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lindsey v. Miller-Saltarello et al
as 6:2024cv01322
Defendant:
Heidi Miller-Saltarello, Benjamin T. Smith and John/Jane Doe(s)
Plaintiff:
Matthew Colin Lindsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edgtton v. Albany Police Department et al
as 6:2024cv01693
Defendant:
Albany Chief of Police, Police Support Service Manager, Blake J. Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Jamie Patrick Edgtton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burrell v. Miller
as 6:2024cv01324
Respondent:
Jamie Miller
Petitioner:
William Lamar Burrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hebrard v. DeCoria et al
as 2:2024cv01650
Defendant:
Woodland, Jamie Miller, SRCI and others
Plaintiff:
Alex Thomas Hebrard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
