Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Phantom E-Moto Inc. v. Windhorse Technologies Inc. et al
as 8:2023cv01356
Plaintiff:
Phantom E-Moto Inc.
Defendant:
Windhorse Technologies Inc., Alex Yiming Zhao and Does 1 through 10 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Zhejiang Chic Robot Technology Co., Ltd. v. Phantom E-Moto Inc.
as 8:2023cv01057
Plaintiff:
Zhejiang Chic Robot Technology Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
Phantom E-Moto Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
ZHEJIANG CHIC ROBOT TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. et al
as 8:2023cv01056
Plaintiff:
ZHEJIANG CHIC ROBOT TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
Petitioner:
PHANTOM E-MOTO INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
HTTMT GROUP LLC et al v. Arlen Ness Enterprises, Inc.
as 4:2022cv01656
Plaintiff:
HTTMT GROUP LLC, SECRET EQUIPMENT INC., XKH GROUP INC. and others
Defendant:
Arlen Ness Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Paramount Restyling Automotive Inc et al v. Galaxy Moto Inc et al
as 2:2018mc00056
Plaintiff:
Paramount Restyling Automotive Inc and Warner Science Applications
Defendant:
Galaxy Moto Inc, GC Innovation, Razer Auto Inc and others
Paramount Restyling Automotive Inc et al v. Galaxy Moto Inc et al
as 2:2018cv00813
Plaintiff:
Paramount Restyling Automotive Inc and Warner Science Applications
Defendant:
Galaxy Moto Inc, GC Innovation, Razer Auto Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Paramount Restyling Automotive Inc. et al v. Galaxy Moto Inc. et al
as 5:2017cv01102
Defendant:
Jennifer Chi, Samuel Chi, Garry Ching and others
Plaintiff:
Paramount Restyling Automotive Inc. and Warner Science Applications
Diamonback Motos Inc et al v. Manheim Corporation Services Inc et al
as 5:2011cv00691
Plaintiff:
Lance M Benedict and Diamonback Motos Inc
Defendant:
Does and Manheim Corporation Services Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
