Cases 1 - 10 of 475
Maria Nava v. Target Corporation et al
as 8:2024cv01347
Plaintiff:
Maria Nava
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Miranda Nava, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3365
Petitioner:
PATRICIA MIRANDA NAVA, ELIXANDRO NARANJO MIRANDA, JULIAN NARANJO MIRANDA and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Pioneers Memorial Healthcare District v. Imperial Valley Healthcare District et al
as 3:2024cv00861
Plaintiff:
Pioneers Memorial Healthcare District
Defendant:
Robert Amparano
Respondent:
Imperial Valley Healthcare District, Enola Berker, Katherine Burnworth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ss Fed. Question: Constitutionality of State Statutes
Garcia Nava v. Lundy
as 3:2024cv02808
Petitioner:
Juan L. Garcia Nava
Respondent:
Warden Leanna Lundy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States of America v. Cortes Nava
as 24-2924
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
KARLA GLORIA CORTES NAVA
Nava-Patricio v. Garland
as 24-2683
Petitioner:
YOVANNI NAVA-PATRICIO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Simon Joaquin Vega v. B. Nava et al
as 2:2024cv02194
Plaintiff:
Simon Joaquin Vega
Defendant:
Correctional Officer B. Nava, Correctional Officer D. Landeros, Correctional Officer J. Cortez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Nava v. FCA US LLC et al
as 2:2024cv02128
Plaintiff:
Daniel Nava
Defendant:
FCA US LLC and Does 1 through 20 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Property Damage
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00407
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
United States of America v. Nava
as 24-2222
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
EDGAR EMMANUEL NAVA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
