Cases 1 - 10 of 110
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Valdez v. Oregon Federal District Court, et al.
as 24-1676
Petitioner:
JOSE GUADALUPE VALDEZ
Respondent:
OREGON FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT and DOJ - OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
Basey v. Reardon, et al.
as 24-1072
Plaintiff:
KALEB LEE BASEY
Defendant:
KYLE FREDERICK REARDON, in his official capacity, JOLENE GOEDEN, in her official capacity, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Peyton v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Fresno
as 23-4067
Petitioner:
RAYMOND E. PEYTON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO
Not Classified By Court:
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRUSTEE, (Fresno), KATHLEEN ALLISON, ROB BONTA and others
Jordan v. DOJ - Office of the United States Attorney
as 23-3862
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES B. JORDAN
Defendant / Appellee:
DOJ - OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
