Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Vital Distributions, LLC v. Pepperidge Farm, Inc.
as 24-2118
Plaintiff:
VITAL DISTRIBUTIONS, LLC, a California limited liability company
Defendant:
PEPPERIDGE FARM, INC., a Connecticut corporation
Cleveland et al v. Campbell Soup Company et al
as 3:2021cv06002
Plaintiff:
Denise Cleveland and Lanna Rainwater
Defendant:
Campbell Soup Company and Pepperidge Farm, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02463
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Daniel Mulhern v. Pepperidge Farm, Inc.
as 2:2019cv01660
Plaintiff:
Daniel Mulhern and Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Pepperidge Farm, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Raymond Alfred, et al v. Pepperidge Farm Inc.
as 17-56336
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RAYMOND ALFRED and MARVIN BARRISH, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellant:
PEPPERIDGE FARM INC.
Raymond Alfred, et al v. Pepperidge Farm Inc.
as 17-80074
Plaintiff - Respondent:
RAYMOND ALFRED and MARVIN BARRISH, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Petitioner:
PEPPERIDGE FARM INC.
Raymond Alfred et al v. Pepperidge Farm, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv07086
Plaintiff:
Raymond Alfred and Marvin Barrish
Defendant:
Does and Pepperidge Farm, Inc.
Koehler v. Pepperidge Farm, Inc.
as 4:2013cv02644
Plaintiff:
Garett Koehler
Defendant:
Pepperidge Farm, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
John Atchley, et al v. Pepperidge Farm Inc.
as 09-35275
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN R. ATCHLEY, a married man and MICHAEL GILROY, a married man
Defendant - Appellee:
PEPPERIDGE FARM INC., a Connecticut corporation
John Atchley, et al v. Pepperidge Farm Inc.
as 08-35664
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN R. ATCHLEY, a married man and MICHAEL GILROY
Defendant - Appellee:
PEPPERIDGE FARM INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
