Cases 1 - 5 of 5
State of California v. Del Rosa, et al.
as 24-698
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel. Rob Bonta, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California,
Defendant / Appellant:
PHILLIP DEL ROSA, in his personal and official capacity as Chairman of the Alturas Indian Rancheria, DARREN ROSE, in his personal and official capacity as Vice-chairman of the Alturas Indian Rancheria and WENDY DEL ROSA, in her official capacity as Secretary-Treasurer of the Alturas Indian Rancheria
Defendant:
AZUMA CORPORATION
State of California v. Azuma Corporation, et al
as 23-16200
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Defendant / Appellant:
AZUMA CORPORATION, PHILLIP DEL ROSA, in his personal and official capacity as Chairman of the Alturas Indian Rancheria, DARREN ROSE, in his personal and official capacity as Vice-chairman of the Alturas Indian Rancheria and others
State of CA v. Azuma Corp., et al
as 2:2023cv00743
Plaintiff:
State of California
Defendant:
Azuma Corporation, Phillip Del Rosa, Darren Rose and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
v. State of California, ex rel. Rob Bonta, Attorney General of California et al
as 2:2023at00369
Defendant:
State of California, ex rel. Rob Bonta, Attorney General of California, Azuma Corporation, Darren Rose and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
State of California, ex rel. Rob Bonta, Attorney General of California v. Azuma Corporation et al
as 2:2023at00370
Plaintiff:
State of California, ex rel. Rob Bonta, Attorney General of California
Defendant:
Azuma Corporation, Phillip Del Rosa, Wendy Del Rosa and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
