Cases 1 - 10 of 154
(PS) Roots v. Fox et al
as 2:2024cv01767
Plaintiff:
Donald Roots
Defendant:
Robert W. Fox, Edmund G. Brown, Gavin Newsom and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Louis Peets v. Jerry Brown, Jr., et al
as 23-15811
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOUIS IVESTER PEETS
Defendant / Appellee:
JERRY BROWN, Jr., Governor of the State of California, SCOTT KERNAN, Secretary of CDCR, KATHLEEN ALLISON, Director of CDCR's Adult Institutions and others
Louis Peets v. Jerry Brown, Jr., et al
as 23-15101
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOUIS IVESTER PEETS
Defendant / Appellee:
JERRY BROWN, Jr., Governor of the State of California, SCOTT KERNAN, Secretary of CDCR, KATHLEEN ALLISON, Director of CDCR's Adult Institutions and others
Ronnie Govea v. Robert Fox, et al
as 23-15034
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONNIE R. GOVEA
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT W. FOX, Warden, F. RADING, JOSEPH BICK and others
James Hampton v. Robert Fox
as 22-56085
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES EARL HAMPTON
Respondent / Appellee:
ROBERT W. FOX, Warden
(PC) Quinones v. St. Andre et al
as 2:2022cv00833
Plaintiff:
Steven Quinones
Defendant:
Rob St. Andre, Richard Grey, Robert C Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Xiong v. Fox
as 2:2022at00307
Petitioner:
Yor Xiong
Respondent:
Robert W. Fox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Xiong v. Fox
as 2:2022cv00538
Petitioner:
Yor Xiong
Respondent:
Robert W. Fox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Louis Peets v. Scott Kernan, et al
as 21-16395
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOUIS IVESTER PEETS
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT KERNAN, Secretary of CDCR, KATHLEEN ALLISON, Director of CDCR's Adult Institutions, ROBERT W. FOX, Warden, Warden and others
Defendant:
JERRY BROWN, Jr., VALERIE VILLARREAL, CARMEN HAMILTON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
