Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Francis Grandinetti, II v. Scott Harrington, et al
as 20-17151
Defendant / Appellee:
M. FRINK, Senior Warden, Saguaro Correctional Center, SCOTT HARRINGTON, HCF Warden (HFA), LAURIE NADAMOTO and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANCIS ANTHONY GRANDINETTI II
Jacinto Alvarez, et al v. Christoher LaRose, et al
as 20-55795
Petitioner / Appellant:
GEORGE RIDLEY, LEOPOLDO SZURGOT, MARLENE CANO and others
Respondent / Appellee:
STEVEN C. STAFFORD, United States Marshal for the Southern District of California, CHRISTOHER J. LAROSE, Senior Warden, Otay Mesa Detention Center and DONALD W. WASHINGTON, Director of the United States Marshals Service
Hamidullah Habibi v. William Barr, et al
as 20-55506
Petitioner / Appellant:
HAMIDULLAH HABIBI
Respondent / Appellee:
CHAD F. WOLF, Secretary of the United States Department of Homeland Security, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, Deputy Director and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, CHRISTOPHER J. LAROSE, Senior Warden, Otay Mesa Detention Center and others
Grandinetti v. Frink et al
as 1:2020cv00068
Defendant:
David Darren Swenson, Nolan P. Espinda, Governor David Y. Ige and others
Interested Party:
Shelley Harrington and Laurie Nadamoto
Plaintiff:
Francis Grandinetti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Robert Lockwood v. Baily, et al
as 19-55386
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT D. LOCKWOOD, AKA Cecil Brown
Defendant / Appellee:
GARY SCHAFER, Texas Prison Institutional Divisions Security Gate Operations Director, in his official and individual capacity, RICHERSON, Senior Warden, in his/her official and individual capacity, GREG ABBOTT, Governor of Texas, in his official and individual capacity and others
Defendant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Oswaldo Castro v. USDCSF
as 10-71874
:
In re: OSWALDO LOPEZ CASTRO
Petitioner:
OSWALDO LOPEZ CASTRO
Respondent:
USDC, SAN FRANCISCO
Real Party In Interest:
WALT WELDS, Senior Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
