Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Jones v. Neven et al
as 3:2018cv00033
Defendant:
Mr. Baca, Loeman Church, Greg Cox and others
Unknown:
A Wayne Carter, Martin I. Melendrez, Robert Simon and others
702) 386-1946 (fax:
Raelene K. Palmer, Raelene K. Palmer, Raelene K. Palmer and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher A. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Snow v. E.K. McDaniel, et al
as 13-16468
Plaintiff - Appellant:
A JOHN OLIVER SNOW
Defendant - Appellee:
E.K. MCDANIEL, Warden, in his official capacity as Warden @ ESP, ROBERT BANNISTER, STEVEN MACARTHUR and others
Christopher Jones v. Dwight Neven, et al
as 12-16571
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER A. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden, BACA, COLE MORROW and others
Kevin Lisle v. Howard Skolnick, et al
as 12-15141
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN J. LISLE
Defendant - Appellee:
HOWARD SKOLNICK, ROBERT BANNISTER, RENE BAKER and others
Lisle v. Skolnik et al
as 3:2011cv00338
Defendant:
Rene Baker, Robert Bannister, Max Carter and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin J. Lisle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Funches v. Thompson et al
as 3:2009cv00343
Plaintiff:
Marritte Funches
Defendant:
Gerald Thompson, Martin Sorenson, James Benedetti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nathaniel Morris v. Steven MacArthur
as 09-15425
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHANIEL MORRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVEN MACARTHUR
Christopher Jones v. Dwight Neven, et al
as 08-17677
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER A. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
DWIGHT NEVEN, BACA, COLE MORROW and others
Lisle v. McDaniel, et al
as 2:2008cv00872
Plaintiff:
Kevin J Lisle
Defendant:
E. K. McDaniel, Steven MacArthur, Joe Brackbill and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Christopher Jones v. Dwight Neven, et al
as 08-16420
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER A. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
DWIGHT NEVEN, BACA, COLE MORROW and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
