Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Doe v. Becerra, et al.
as 24-332
Petitioner: JOHN DOE
Respondent: MOISES BECERRA, Field Office Director of the San Francisco Field Office of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, TAE D. JOHNSON, Acting Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Abdirahman Kariye, et al v. Alejandro Mayorkas, et al
as 23-55790
Plaintiff / Appellant: ABDIRAHMAN ADEN KARIYE, MOHAMAD MOUSLLI and HAMEEM SHAH
Defendant / Appellee: ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, in his official capacity, TAE D. JOHNSON, Acting Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, in his official capacity, STEVE K. FRANCIS, Acting Executive Associate Director, Homeland Security Investigations, in his official capacity and others
Defendant: MARK MORGAN, Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, in his official capacity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-55170
Plaintiff / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Leonel Lagunas v. Merrick Garland
as 21-16879
Petitioner: LEONEL SANCHEZ LAGUNAS
Respondent: DAVID W. JENNINGS, Field Office Director of the San Francisco Field Office of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, TAE D. JOHNSON, Acting Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and others
Willian Rauda v. David Jennings, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-16062
Defendant / Appellee: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, DAVID JENNINGS, in his official capacity, Field Office Director of San Francisco Filed Office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, Acting Secretary of Department of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: WILLIAN MATIAS RAUDA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?