Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Nagel v. Miami-Dade County et al
as 1:2019cv00201
Defendant: Bill LNU, Charles Tynon, Jose Doorman and others
Plaintiff: Marcus Nagel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nagel v. Hilton et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00123
Defendant: Charles Tynon, Legal/Compliance Manager Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Company of Bruce Fyfe and others
Plaintiff: Marcus Nagel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nagel v. Warren et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00113
Defendant: Charles Tynon, Linda Ford, Company of Bruce Fyfe and others
Plaintiff: Marcus Nagel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nagel v. Janvier et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00111
Defendant: Charles Tynon, Lexolution Client Associate, Manpower Attorney 13 and others
Plaintiff: Marcus Nagel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nagel v. Diaz et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00110
Defendant: Charles Tynon, John Edwards, Company of Bruce Fyfe and others
Plaintiff: Marcus Nagel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paul Tynon v. Carolyn W. Colvin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2013cv01664
USA v. Daniel Tynon
as 13-50341
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: DANIEL NELSON TYNON, AKA Daniel W. Tynon, AKA Dan Tyron, AKA Richard Allen White
Stephen A Whitlock et al v. Dan N Tynon et al
as 2:2012mc00372
Defendant: Dant Corporation and Dan N Tynon
Plaintiff: Mary Ann M Whitlock and Stephen A Whitlock
Stephen A Whitlock et al v. Dan N Tynon et al
as 2:2012mc00310
Defendant: Dant Corporation and Dan N Tynon
Plaintiff: Mary Ann Whitlock and Steven A Whitlock
Stephen A Whitlock et al v Dan N Tynon et al
as 2:2012mc00309
Defendant: Dant Corporation and Dan N Tynon
Plaintiff: Mary Ann Whitlock and Stephen A Whitlock

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?