Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Lane et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2023cv00989
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Lane and Lataevia V Johnson
Defendant:
United States of America and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
NOT USED
as 2:2023cv00949
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Lane
Defendant:
Lataevia V. Johnson, United States of America and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Bryan Bonham v. State of Nevada Ex Rel, et al
as 23-15175
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRYAN P. BONHAM
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF NEVADA EX REL, NEVADA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS, ex rel, CHARLES DANIELS and others
Anthony Robinson v. Dave Davey, et al
as 22-15391
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY L. ROBINSON
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVE DAVEY, Warden, Warden, CSP-Corcoran, C. MUNOZ, Correctional Officer at CSP-Corcoran, A. V. JOHNSON, Correctional Officer and others
(PC) Price v. Gill et al
as 2:2021cv02295
Plaintiff:
Scott Richard Price
Defendant:
Gill, C. Goncalves, R. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reno Rios v. Connie Gipson, et al
as 21-16652
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RENO FUENTES RIOS
Defendant / Appellee:
CONNIE GIPSON, Warden, T. CAMPBELL, Captain, A. V. JOHNSON, Lieutenant and others
Harris v. Daniels
as 2:2021cv01560
Plaintiff:
Trenton Harris
Defendant:
Charles Daniels, Jeremy Bean, T. Struck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonham v. Daniels
as 2:2021cv01566
Plaintiff:
Bryan P. Bonham
Defendant:
Charles Daniels, Calvin Johnson, Jeremy Bean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Monge v. Daniels
as 2:2021cv01562
Plaintiff:
Collin Monge
Defendant:
Charles Daniels, Calvin Johnson, Jeremy Bean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torres v. Daniels
as 2:2021cv01561
Plaintiff:
Pablo Torres
Defendant:
Charles Daniels, Calvin Johnson, Jeremy Bean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
