Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Moreno Hinostroza, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2783
Petitioner:
KARINA MORENO HINOSTROZA, FABIOLA NAOMI CANCHAYA MORENO and DAYLIN XIOMARA CANCHAYA MORENO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Velasco-Andrade, et al. v. Garland
as 23-4296
Petitioner:
CRISTINA XIOMARA VELASCO-ANDRADE and MARIA GUADALUPE IRAHETA-VELASCO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Calderon-Lopez De Rodriguez, et al. v. Garland
as 23-4151
Petitioner:
DARLIN XIOMARA CALDERON-LOPEZ DE RODRIGUEZ, JEFERSON LEONEL RODRIGUEZ-CALDERON and DILAND ALEXIS RODRIGUEZ-CALDERON
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Sanchez-Vasquez, et al. v. Garland
as 23-3918
Petitioner:
XIOMARA YANETH SANCHEZ-VASQUEZ and MICHAEL OMAR ARGUETA-SANCHEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 lm Removal- Labor/Mgmt. Relations
Espinal Gomez v. Garland
as 22-694
Petitioner:
LESLY XIOMARA ESPINAL GOMEZ, MARINA LIZETH CARRANZA ESPINAL and RUTH CLARISSA CARRANZA ESPINAL
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv08683
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Bernal v. United States of America et al
as 2:2021cv08014
Defendant:
Eve R. Berg, Joanne Person, Mirjana Nichiporuk Tolt and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Maria Bernal
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Lisa Bernal v. Providence Health, et al
as 21-55661
Defendant / Appellee:
JESSICA BENTLEY, BRIAN J. MCNAMARA, KATELYN MICHEL HICKS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LISA M. BERNAL
Daysi Sanchez, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 21-70788
Petitioner:
KENIA MARLENY RIVAS-SANCHEZ, KATYA XIOMARA RIVAS-SANCHEZ and DAYSI MARLENY SANCHEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
