Cases 41 - 50 of 61
Schultz v. State of Alabama et al
as 5:2012cv03675
Petitioner:
James Edward Schultz
Respondent:
State of Alabama , Carter, Circuit Court of Cullman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kelly v. Davenport et al
as 5:2012cv03473
Petitioner:
Terry L Kelly
Respondent:
Carter Davenport and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ward v. The Attorney General of the State of Alabama et al
as 5:2012cv03418
Petitioner:
Carl Brad Ward
Respondent:
The Attorney General of the State of Alabama and Carter Davenport
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woods v. Davenport et al
as 5:2012cv02506
Petitioner:
Jamal Roydrick Woods
Respondent:
Carter F Davenport and Attorney General for the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Davenport et al
as 4:2012cv02044
Petitioner:
Glennie Dee Davis
Respondent:
Carter F Davenport and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bagley v. Carter et al
as 1:2012cv01030
Petitioner:
James E Bagley
Respondent:
Luther Strange and Betina Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Davenport et al
as 2:2011cv03271
Petitioner:
Tony Lee Smith
Respondent:
Carter Davenport and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mackey v. Mitchem et al
as 3:2011cv03156
Petitioner:
Jamie Allen Mackey
Respondent:
Attorney General for the State of Alabama, The and Betina Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bryant v. Davenport et al
as 2:2011cv02301
Petitioner:
Nicholas Bryant
Respondent:
Carter Davenport and Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Carter v. Price et al
as 7:2011cv01440
Petitioner:
Albert Carter , Jr
Respondent:
C Price and Attorney General for the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
