Cases 41 - 50 of 3,519
Motamoros-Santillan v. Neely
as 7:2024cv00085
Petitioner:
Irma Motamoros-Santillan and Irma Matamoros-Santillan
Respondent:
Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Garcia Jaime v. Neely
as 7:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Ingrid Mariela Garcia Jaime
Defendant:
Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Agho-Allen v. Neely
as 7:2024cv00101
Petitioner:
Itohan Agho-Allen
Respondent:
Warden Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hicks v. Horton
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 4:2024cv00063
Petitioner:
Dalton Hicks
Respondent:
Jonathan Horton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pettway v. McClain et al
as 2:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Mikel Dewayne Pettway
Defendant:
Antonio McClain and Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hartford v. Kilgore
as 1:2024cv00222
Petitioner:
Jimmy Dale Hartford
Respondent:
Jimmy Kilgore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jacinto v. Neely
as 7:2024cv00084
Petitioner:
Monica E. Galvan Jacinto
Respondent:
Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Moore v. Neely
as 7:2024cv00011
Petitioner:
Connie Monique Moore
Respondent:
Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Salas v. Warden Neely
as 7:2023cv01768
Petitioner:
Elizabeth Hernandez Salas
Respondent:
Warden Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jacobson v. Horton
as 4:2024cv00002
Petitioner:
David Otto Jacobson
Respondent:
Jonathan W Horton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.