Cases 131 - 140 of 3,660
McCoy v. Pell City Police Division et al
as 1:2022cv00377
Plaintiff:
Randal McCoy
Defendant:
Pell City Police Division and Pell City Municipal Court System
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray v. Lisa et al
as 2:2022cv00420
Plaintiff:
Kevin B Gray
Defendant:
Lisa, J Burnum, Public Defenders Office of Shelby County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hooper v. Newell
as 6:2022cv00259
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Ryan Hooper
Defendant:
Michael E Newell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clemons v. Madison County Alabama Circuit Court et al
as 5:2022cv00466
Plaintiff:
Charles Randolph Clemons
Defendant:
Madison County Alabama Circuit Court and Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Alabama, State of
as 7:2022cv00258
Plaintiff:
Lavarice Wilson
Defendant:
Alabama, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. Tuscaloosa County Sheriff Office et al
as 7:2022cv00274
Plaintiff:
William D Dixon
Defendant:
Tuscaloosa County Sheriff Office and Ryan Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kister v. Willis et al
as 2:2022cv00189
Plaintiff:
John Andrew Kister
Defendant:
Bruce A Willis and Securus Technologies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LoRusso v. Brooks
as 2:2022cv00260
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony LoRusso
Defendant:
Mo Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mendez-Sandoval v. United States of America et al
as 7:2022cv00235
Plaintiff:
Eva Mendez-Sandoval
Defendant:
United States of America and Eric Todd Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Ford v. Alabama Deparment of Corrections et al
as 7:2022cv00103
Plaintiff:
Michael Kardell Ford
Defendant:
Alabama Deparment of Corrections, Kay Ivey, Bibb County Corrections Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
