Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv01414
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Calderon v. United States of America
as 4:2014cv08007
Petitioner:
Efren Ramirez Calderon
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv02210
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv02214
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv01318
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ramirez-Mendoza v. International Pallet Inc
as 2:2013cv00519
Plaintiff:
Joel Ramirez Mendoza
Defendant:
International Pallet Inc
Counter_claimant:
International Pallet Inc
Counter_defendant:
Joel Ramirez Mendoza
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ramirez v. Jefferson County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2012cv04040
Plaintiff:
Jesus Aguilar Ramirez
Defendant:
Jefferson County Sheriff's Department and Mike Hale
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramirez v. Rathman
as 2:2012cv03580
Petitioner:
Jason John Ramirez
Respondent:
John T Rathman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv03437
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Nava et al v. Casa Mexicana Restaurant Inc et al
as 3:2012cv02503
Plaintiff:
Edialberto Nava , Oscar Felix and Joel Nava
Defendant:
Casa Mexicana Restaurant Inc, Ramiro Ramirez, Jose Ornelas and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
