Cases 61 - 70 of 114
Obermann Concrete Inc v. J.P. Graham Transport Inc
as 5:2014cv00584
Plaintiff:
Obermann Concrete Inc
Defendant:
J.P. Graham Transport Inc
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81
Broadhead v. Hall et al
as 2:2014cv00289
Plaintiff:
James Broadhead
Defendant:
Hall, Scott, J Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stallworth v. Graham et al
as 4:2014cv00134
Plaintiff:
Freddie James Stallworth
Defendant:
Carla Graham, Chad Cleveland and Carter Davenport
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. Harriss et al
as 4:2013cv01829
Plaintiff:
Alvin Randy Pierce
Defendant:
Sheriff Jimmy Harriss, Chief Jailer Matt Martin, Deputy Chief Jailer Tiffany Graham and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 7:2013cv01688
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Graham
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Graham v. United States of America
as 1:2013cv08031
Petitioner:
David E Graham
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Nationwide Life Insurance Co v. Graham et al
as 1:2013cv00925
Plaintiff:
Nationwide Life Insurance Co
Defendant:
Beverley Graham , Antwan T Graham, Melissa Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00748
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Bennett v. Smith et al
as 4:2013cv00399
Plaintiff:
Jerry Dale Bennett
Defendant:
Ronald W. Smith and John Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sinerius v. Beatty et al
as 2:2012cv03476
Plaintiff:
Dean Sinerius
Defendant:
David R Beatty, Howard L Clark, Jr, Jerry W Kolb and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
