Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Gordon v. Carter et al
as 1:2023cv00384
Plaintiff:
Justin Terrell Gordon
Defendant:
Karen Carter and Steven T. Marshall
Respondent:
Rolanda Calloway and Pamela Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
King v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00147
Plaintiff:
Steven D King
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Warden McClain, Officer Mendozza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Carter
as 1:2023cv00145
Petitioner:
Demetric Antonio Robinson
Respondent:
Karen Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tate v. Carter et al
as 1:2023cv00090
Plaintiff:
Frederick A. Tate
Defendant:
Karen Carter, Easterling Correctional Facility and Steve Marsall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shropshire v. Carter et al
as 1:2023cv00033
Plaintiff:
Donnie Earl Shropshire
Defendant:
Karen Carter and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carter v. Calloway et al
as 1:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Brandon Elliot Carter
Defendant:
Rolanda Calloway and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ginett v. Hamm et al
as 1:2022cv00506
Petitioner:
Geovanni Xavier Ginett
Respondent:
John Hamm, Karen Carter and John Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dennis v. Carter
as 1:2022cv00445
Petitioner:
Elmer Dennis, Jr.
Respondent:
Karen Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
King v. Wexford et al
as 1:2022cv00286
Plaintiff:
Steven D. King
Defendant:
Wexford, Supervisor Murphy, Nurse Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Butler
as 1:2022cv00110
Petitioner:
Gregory Lee Carter
Respondent:
Reosha Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
