Cases 1 - 10 of 202
McCreary v. State of Alabama
as 1:2024cv00079
Petitioner:
Roger Lee McCreary
Respondent:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boone v. Mack
as 1:2024cv00067
Petitioner:
George Boone, Jr.
Respondent:
State Of Alabama and Huey Hoss Mack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Norton v. State of Alabama
as 1:2023cv00448
Petitioner:
Thomas Norton
Respondent:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
State of Alabama v. Pugh
as 1:2023cv00362
Plaintiff:
State of Alabama
Defendant:
Jason Pugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Removal of Civil/Criminal Action from State Court
Donald v. State of Alabama et al
as 1:2023cv00353
Plaintiff:
John Riley Donald
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Alabama Bureau of Pardons and Parole and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lockett v. Williams et al
as 1:2023cv00346
Petitioner:
Donald Dzsan Lockett and Donald D'zsan Lockett
Respondent:
Karen Williams and State Of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McQueen v. State of Alabama Department of Corrections
as 1:2023cv00270
Plaintiff:
Marcus McQueen
Defendant:
State of Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Odom-Davis v. State Of Alabama
as 1:2023cv00257
Petitioner:
Eric Vernardo Odom-Davis
Respondent:
State Of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White v. USA
as 1:2023cv00176
Petitioner:
Lancy White, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Calderwood v. State of Texas
as 1:2022cv00490
Plaintiff:
Donald Joseph Calderwood
Defendant:
State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
