Cases 71 - 80 of 84
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv03022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv05075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Default of Student Loan
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv02028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
United States of America v. Trotter
as 6:2008cv06009
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Gary Trotter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv04004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Default of Student Loan
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv02005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Default of Student Loan
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv03005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Default of Student Loan
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv05014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Default of Student Loan
United States of America for the use and benefit of Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Inc. v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company et al
as 6:2008cv06001
Plaintiff:
United States of America for the use and benefit of Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Inc.
Defendant:
Hartford Fire Insurance Company, Au Authum Ki, Inc. and De Los Santos Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
United States of America v. Wood
as 2:2007cv02130
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
John Leonard Wood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of VA Overpayment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
