Cases 51 - 60 of 24,324
Devin Wade v. CACD Central District of California
as 2:2024cv07321
Petitioner:
Devin Kyle Wade
Respondent:
CACD Central District of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Foster Johnson v. Jeff Macomber et al
as 2:2024cv07074
Respondent:
Jeff Macomber and David Holbrook
Petitioner:
Foster Johnson, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sergio Barbosa v. M. McVay et al
as 2:2024cv07265
Respondent:
M. McVay and L. Bird
Petitioner:
Sergio Barbosa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vester L. Patterson v. Chance Andes
as 2:2024cv07272
Plaintiff:
Vester L. Patterson
Defendant:
Chance Andes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Melissa Sue Rogers v. LaVelle Parker
as 5:2024cv01789
Petitioner:
Melissa Sue Rogers
Respondent:
Lavelle Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jeffrey Geddes v. Honey Gutt et al
as 2:2024cv05899
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Geddes, Sr.
Respondent:
Honey Gutt and Amy Gutter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anthony Guevara v. US Attorney General
as 2:2024cv07094
Respondent:
US Attorney General
Petitioner:
Anthony Guevara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Timothy Minh Ha v. B. Birkholz
as 2:2024cv07109
Petitioner:
Timothy Minh Ha
Respondent:
B. Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Gonzalo Alarcon v. Fidencio Guzman
as 2:2024cv06108
Petitioner:
Gonzalo Alarcon
Respondent:
Fidencio Guzman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daniel Emerson Norton v. J. Doerer
as 5:2024cv01370
Petitioner:
Daniel Emerson Norton
Respondent:
Warden J. Doerer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
