Cases 1 - 10 of 30
William Angelo Latten Jr. v. John Doe et al
as 2:2023cv03156
Plaintiff:
William Angelo Latten, Jr.
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe, P. Holman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvin Darrell Smith v. United States et al
as 5:2022cv00702
Plaintiff:
Alvin Darrell Smith
Defendant:
United States, Michael D. Carvajal, Harley Lappin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Travis J. Brown v. R. Egelin et al
as 5:2021cv01058
Plaintiff:
Travis J. Brown and Travis Jordan Brown
Defendant:
R. Egelin, Doe Defendant, D. Barnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sebren A. Pierce v. Craig Koenig et al
as 5:2019cv01875
Plaintiff:
Sebren A Pierce
Defendant:
Craig Koenig, County of San Bernardino and Superior Court of California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Anthony Jointer v. Tony Rackauckas et al
as 8:2016cv02269
Defendant:
Michael Harper, Ronald J. LeMieux, John Lett and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Jointer
Seavon Pierce v. The U.S. Government et al
as 2:2016cv08010
Defendant:
Pierce V. Gonzales, Attorney General Kamala D. Harris, President Barack Obama and others
Plaintiff:
Seavon Pierce
Seavon Pierce v. The U.S. Government et al
as 2:2016cv07556
Defendant:
Attorney General Kamala Harris, The California Department Corrections, The U.S. Government and others
Plaintiff:
Seavon Pierce
Seavon Pierce v. United States Congress et al
as 2:2016cv05933
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigations, Federal Judicial Commission, Federal Judicial Commission and others
Plaintiff:
Seavon Pierce
Seavon Pierce v. President Barack Obama et al
as 2:2016cv05387
Defendant:
Barbara A. Boxer, Civil Fraud, Investigations Div, Civil-Criminal Enforcement Division and others
Plaintiff:
Seavon Pierce
David Randolph Smith v. Jacquelyn Lacey et al
as 2:2016cv01986
Defendant:
Mr. Edmund G. Brown, Mr. Edmund G. Brown, Matthew Cates and others
Plaintiff:
David Randolph Smith
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
