Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Dual Diagnosis Treatment Center, et al v. California Department of Social Services, et al
as 8:2021cv01488
Plaintiff:
Dual Diagnosis Treatment Center, Inc., Adeona Health Care, LLC and Tonmoy Sharma
Defendant:
California Department of Social Services and Gregory Rose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jimmie D. Hood v. Department of Social Services
as 2:2020cv02536
Plaintiff:
Jimmie D. Hood
Defendant:
Department of Social Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chicuace Chicuace v. Department of Social Services
as 2:2019cv03193
Plaintiff:
Chicuace Chicuace
Defendant:
Department of Social Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. Tanooa Sparks
as 2:2018cv10027
Defendant:
Tanooa Sparks
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Garnishee:
Department of Social Services State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3205 Garnishment
Moriah Zeigler v. County of San Luis Obispo et al
as 2:2017cv09295
Defendant:
Alfredo Campos, County of San Luis Obispo, County of San Luis Obispo Department of Social Services and others
Plaintiff:
Moriah Zeigler
Trina Ray v. California Department of Social Services et al
as 2:2017cv04239
Defendant:
California Department of Social Services and Los Angeles County Department of Public Social Services
Unknown:
Brian P Walter and Danny Young-In Yoo
Plaintiff:
Trina Ray
Craig A Humphries, et al v. Los Angeles County, et al
as 8:2003cv00697
Defendant:
Charles T Ansberry, Charles T Ansberry, Leroy D Baca and others
Intervenor:
California Department of Social Services
Unknown:
Dep In Chg So Div and James V Selna
Plaintiff:
Craig Arthur Humphries and Wendy Dawn Aborn Humphries
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nicholas Dispenza v. County of Orange et al
as 8:2012cv00879
Respondent:
California Department of Social Services and County of Orange
Petitioner:
Nicholas Dispenza
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
