Cases 101 - 110 of 37,529
Rocky N. Boice v. Brian Birkholz
as 2:2024cv01963
Petitioner:
Rocky N. Boice, Jr.
Respondent:
Brian Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jalaal Abdullah v. Kelly Santoro et al
as 2:2024cv03139
Plaintiff:
Jalaal Ibn Abdullah
Defendant:
Kelly Santoro, John or Jane Doe, K. Mixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Rowe v. A. Bender
as 2:2024cv02282
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rowe
Defendant:
A. Bender
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Francisco H. Prado v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2024cv00477
Plaintiff:
Francisco H. Prado
Defendant:
County of Riverside, Sheriff Chad Blanco, Dennis Vroom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin M. De Hoog v. Masked Guards of Theo Lacy Strip Search
as 8:2024cv00472
Plaintiff:
Kevin M. De Hoog
Defendant:
Masked Guards of Theo Lacy Strip Search
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Esteban Mujica v. CDCR-State of California
as 5:2024cv00921
Petitioner:
Esteban Mujica
Respondent:
CDCR-State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kevin M. DeHoog v. Theo Lacy Masked Guards
as 8:2024cv00586
Plaintiff:
Kevin M DeHoog
Defendant:
Theo Lacy Masked Guards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02972
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Clifford C. Loyer v. Orange County Health Care Agency
as 8:2024cv00808
Plaintiff:
Clifford Chaun Loyer
Defendant:
Orange County Health Care Agency
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deshone M. Lacey Jr. v. M. Felts et al
as 8:2024cv00816
Plaintiff:
Deshone M. Lacey Jr.
Defendant:
M. Felts, Don Barnes, K. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
