Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Donovan Conner v. People of the State of Califorina
as 5:2011cv01675
Petitioner:
Donovan Conner
Respondent:
People of the State of Califorina
Andrew Kwasi Donkor v. The United States of America et al
as 5:2011cv01518
Defendant:
Bob Backes, Edmund G Brown, Jr, California Board of Parole and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Kwasi Donkor
Andrew Kwasi Donkor v. The United States of America et al
as 5:2011cv01409
Defendant:
Paul R Babeu, Bob Backes, R Benvenue and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Kwasi Donkor
Jimme Lee Adams v. Cook et al
as 2:2010cv01992
Petitioner:
Jimmie Lee Adams, Sr
Respondent:
Baxter, Conners, Cook and others
Wallace Conners v. Los Angeles County Sheriff Department et al
as 2:2009cv05350
Plaintiff:
Wallace Conners
Defendant:
Los Angeles County Sheriff Department, Lee Baca, Rios and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Chung Chung Kao v. M. Vela et al
as 2:2009cv02841
Plaintiff:
Chung Chung Kao
Defendant:
M. Vela, M. Vela, D. Engler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keith W Conner v. Ken Clark
as 5:2008cv00160
Petitioner:
Keith W Conner
Respondent:
Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Conner v. Almager
as 5:2007cv01625
Petitioner:
Michael O Conner
Respondent:
V M Almager
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wallace Conners v. Lee Baca et al
as 2:2007cv05704
Plaintiff:
Wallace Conners, Jr
Defendant:
Lee Baca, Los Angeles Sheriff Department and Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Wallace Conners v. Antonio Villaraigosa et al
as 2:2007cv04222
Plaintiff:
Wallace Conners, Jr
Defendant:
Antonio Villaraigosa, Rockard Delgadillo, Los Angeles Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
