Cases 21 - 30 of 493
Arron Michael Lewis v. M. Gutierrez
as 2:2022cv05832
Petitioner:
Arron Michael Lewis
Respondent:
M. Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Timothy D. Wilkins v. D. Samuels et al
as 2:2022cv02434
Plaintiff:
Timothy D. Wilkins
Defendant:
D. Samuels, B. Phillips, S. Wilhite and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
George Lewis v. People of The State of California
as 2:2022cv00891
Petitioner:
George Lewis
Respondent:
People of The State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carl Patrick Lewis v. People of The State of California
as 2:2022cv00814
Plaintiff:
Carl Patrick Lewis
Defendant:
People of The State of California
Respondent:
Warren L. Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richard Carrasco et al v. P. Delatorre et al
as 2:2022cv00720
Plaintiff:
Richard Carrasco
Defendant:
P. Delatorre, Doe Lewis, Ms. Doe Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Melvin Lewis, II v. Ms. T. Jusino
as 5:2022cv00200
Petitioner:
Melvin Lewis, II
Respondent:
Ms. T. Jusino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Kevin D. Lewis v. Unknown
as 2:2022cv00539
Plaintiff:
Kevin D. Lewis
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis Butler v. Warden
as 2:2022cv00507
Plaintiff:
Lewis Butler
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodney Lewis Ross v. State of California
as 5:2021cv01889
Petitioner:
Rodney Lewis Ross
Respondent:
State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Larry Avila v. R. C. Johnson et al
as 2:2021cv08307
Plaintiff:
Larry Anthony Avila
Defendant:
R. C. Johnson, Dr. Gian Hernandez, Dr. Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
