Cases 21 - 30 of 49
Luis Arnaldo Calazadillas v. M. Martel
as 2:2009cv05098
Petitioner:
Luis Arnaldo Calazadillas
Respondent:
M. Martel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Michael Verdugo Zacarias v. R A Hassinger et al
as 5:2009cv01330
Plaintiff:
Michael Verdugo Zacarias
Defendant:
R A Hassinger, G L Wilkerson, R F Compton, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Ronnie Lee v. M. Martel
as 2:2009cv04764
Petitioner:
Ronnie Lee
Respondent:
M. Martel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Carlos Leon v. M. Martel
as 2:2009cv04187
Petitioner:
Carlos Leon
Respondent:
M. Martel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ricardo Paramo v. Matthew M. Martel
as 2:2009cv03995
Petitioner:
Ricardo Paramo
Respondent:
Matthews M. Martel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James Allen Ivins v. M Martel
as 5:2009cv01022
Petitioner:
James Allen Ivins
Respondent:
M Martel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dwayne Howard v. M. Martel
as 5:2009cv00675
Petitioner:
Dwayne Howard
Respondent:
M Martel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas Robert McNeil v. M Martel et al
as 5:2009cv00638
Petitioner:
Thomas Robert McNeil
Respondent:
M Martel and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas Dallas v. M. Martell
as 5:2009cv00405
Petitioner:
Thomas Dallas
Respondent:
M Martell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gregory Barnes Watson v. M. Martell
as 2:2009cv00801
Petitioner:
Gregory Barnes Watson
Respondent:
M. Martell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.