Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2009cv00338
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2009cv00280
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Thomas Clinton v. James Tilton et al
as 2:2008cv04181
Plaintiff:
Thomas Clinton
Defendant:
James Tilton, John Marshall, D. Engler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Thomas Clinton v. E. Luke et al
as 2:2008cv04179
Plaintiff:
Thomas Clinton
Defendant:
E. Luke, N. Greenman, John Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Thomas Clinton v. R. Green et al
as 2:2008cv04180
Plaintiff:
Thomas Clinton
Defendant:
R. Green, James Tilton, John Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Thomas Clinton v. John Marshall et al
as 2:2008cv04178
Plaintiff:
Thomas Clinton
Defendant:
John Marshall, R. Geovenetti, James Tilton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Clinton v. Meyers et al
as 2:2008cv04177
Plaintiff:
Thomas Clinton
Defendant:
R. Meyers, E. Luke, N. Grannis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Villasenor v. Clinton et al
as 5:2008cv00419
Plaintiff:
Margarito Villasenor
Defendant:
Clinton and M Poulos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Clinton Douglas King v. V. M. Almager
as 2:2007cv07831
Petitioner:
Clinton Douglas King, .
Respondent:
Victor M Almager
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clinton Douglas King v. V M Almager
as 2:2007cv07199
Petitioner:
Clinton Douglas King, .
Respondent:
V M Almager
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
