Cases 31 - 40 of 70
Enrique Zaragoza v. W J Sullivan
as 2:2008cv02912
Petitioner:
Enrique Zaragoza
Respondent:
W J Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robert Vance Poutre Sr v. W.J. Sullivan
as 5:2008cv00421
Petitioner:
Robert Vance Poutre, Sr
Respondent:
W. J. Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alfredo Franco v. W J Sullivan
as 2:2008cv01994
Petitioner:
Alfredo Franco
Respondent:
W J Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv01787
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Tommy Ray Brown v. H. Tate et al
as 2:2008cv01586
Plaintiff:
Tommy Ray Brown
Defendant:
H. Tate, John Doe, W. J. Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Fredric Mora v. W J Sullivan
as 2:2008cv01359
Petitioner:
Michael Fredric Mora
Respondent:
W J Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mark Anthony Hoover v. W J Sullivan
as 5:2008cv00207
Petitioner:
Mark Anthony Hoover
Respondent:
W J Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
David Rayvon Taylor v. W J Sullivan
as 2:2008cv00892
Petitioner:
David Rayvon Taylor
Respondent:
W J Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Porang Godarzi Setodeh v. W J Sullivan
as 2:2008cv00884
Petitioner:
Porang Godarzi Setodeh
Respondent:
W J Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dion Merwin Truehill v. W J Sullivan
as 2:2008cv00848
Petitioner:
Dion Merwin Truehill
Respondent:
W J Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
