Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Central District of California
Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Peter Rolfe Dillon Green v. Mr. Matthews M. Martel We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv02601
Petitioner: Peter Rolfe Dillon Green
Respondent: Matthews M. Martel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oscar Marin v. M. Martel We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv02071
Petitioner: Oscar Marin
Respondent: M Martel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Paul Dickerson v. M. Martel
as 2:2008cv02076
Petitioner: Paul Dickerson
Respondent: M Martel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Luis Arnaldo Calazadillas v. M Martel
as 2:2008cv01409
Petitioner: Luis Arnaldo Calazadillas
Respondent: M Martel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gregory Watson v. Edmond G Brown et al
as 2:2008cv01023
Petitioner: Gregory Watson
Respondent: Edmond G Brown, James E Tilton, James Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Paul Dickerson v. M Martel
as 2:2008cv00829
Petitioner: Paul Dickerson
Respondent: M Martel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Motion to Extend Time to File
David Eugene Givens v. M. Martel We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2008cv00111
Petitioner: David Eugene Givens
Respondent: M Martel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robert C Bass v. Matthew M Martel
as 2:2007cv08332
Petitioner: Robert Curtis Bass
Respondent: Matthew M Martel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James Earl Pierce v. M Martel
as 2:2007cv07344
Petitioner: James Earl Pierce
Respondent: M Martel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?