Cases 1 - 10 of 1,305
Gerald J. Wilson v. C. Geinito et al
as 2:2024cv04104
Plaintiff:
Gerald J. Wilson
Defendant:
Corrections Officers C. Geinito and Health Care Provider John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Juron D. Ervin v. M. Leon et al
as 5:2024cv01024
Plaintiff:
Juron D. Ervin
Defendant:
M. Leon, O. Zamora-Rios, C. Romo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Harper v. C. Chatman
as 2:2024cv03902
Plaintiff:
Daniel James Harper
Defendant:
C Chatman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bruce Koklich et al v. Gavin Newsom et al
as 5:2024cv00721
Plaintiff:
Bruce Koklich and Lawrence Remsen
Defendant:
Gavin C. Newsom, Patricia Guerrero, Kathleen Allison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Van Keyshone Rollen v. C. Pfeiffer
as 5:2024cv00910
Petitioner:
Van Keyshone Rollen
Respondent:
Warden C. Pfeiffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lynden Vanatti et al v. J. Gates et al
as 2:2024cv02157
Plaintiff:
Lynden Vanatti
Defendant:
J. Gates, O. Pavon, J. Ebaniz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leon Dwayne Hardin v. R.C. Johnson et al
as 2:2024cv01823
Plaintiff:
Leon Dwayne Hardin
Defendant:
R. C. Johnson, Jon Does and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jesse Washington v. C. LA Priam
as 2:2024cv01005
Plaintiff:
Jesse Washington
Defendant:
C. LA Priam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adrian Solorio v. C. Pfeiffer
as 8:2024cv00574
Petitioner:
Adrian Solorio
Respondent:
C. Pfeiffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tyrece Jefferson v. G. Guillen et al
as 2:2024cv00972
Plaintiff:
Tyrece Jefferson
Defendant:
K. Guillen and C. Lomeli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
