Cases 1 - 10 of 125
Dante Danil Carter v. F. Guzman
as 5:2024cv00567
Petitioner:
Dante Danil Carter
Respondent:
F Guzman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hung Duong Nguon et al v. Robert Luna et al
as 2:2023cv09937
Plaintiff:
Hung Duong Nguon
Defendant:
Robert Luna, Nicolas Sererato, Larson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharrod Moten v. Paul L. Abrams et al
as 2:2023cv06359
Plaintiff:
Sharrod Moten
Defendant:
Paul L. Abrams, Patrick E. Connlley, David O. Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter Kent Gorg v. Warden
as 8:2023cv01128
Petitioner:
Carter Kent Gorg
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Trent Scentail Smith v. Carter
as 2:2022cv07780
Petitioner:
Trent Scentail Smith
Respondent:
Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Gregory Darwin Carter v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv05284
Petitioner:
Gregory Darwin Carter
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jimmie L Carter v. Connie Gipson
as 2:2022cv04775
Petitioner:
Jimmie L. Carter
Respondent:
Connie Gipson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
John Carter v. D. Samuels
as 2:2022cv04055
Petitioner:
John Carter
Respondent:
D. Samuels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Keith R. Carter v. Ron Broomfield
as 2:2022cv01256
Petitioner:
Keith R. Carter
Respondent:
Ron Broomfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daniel Frazer v. Ralph Diaz et al
as 5:2021cv02117
Plaintiff:
Daniel Frazer
Defendant:
Ralph Diaz, Jeffrey Macomber, Kenneth J. Pogue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
