Cases 1 - 10 of 71
Jeffrey G. Randolph v. Glenice Short Randolph et al
as 2:2024cv05018
Plaintiff:
Jeffery G Randolph
Defendant:
Glenice Short Randolph, Thomasina M. Reed, Sakia Cowans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taiwan Orran Reed v. Tammy L. Campbell
as 5:2024cv00796
Petitioner:
Taiwan Orran Reed
Respondent:
Tammy L. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mazen Alawi v. Unkown et al
as 5:2022cv01003
Plaintiff:
Mazen Alawi
Defendant:
Unkown, County of Riverside Sheriff, Chad Bianco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vincent Reed v. Six Unknown Agents
as 2:2022cv03973
Plaintiff:
Vincent Reed
Defendant:
Six Unknown Agents, Louis Milusnic, Liza Horn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arzuray D. Reed v. Raymond Madden
as 2:2022cv03693
Petitioner:
Arzuray D. Reed
Respondent:
Raymond Madden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alvin Darrell Smith v. United States et al
as 5:2022cv00702
Plaintiff:
Alvin Darrell Smith
Defendant:
United States, Michael D. Carvajal, Harley Lappin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peter Joesph Reed v. Janice Gastelo
as 2:2021cv02205
Petitioner:
Peter Joesph Reed
Respondent:
Janice Gastelo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Yonnedil Carror Torres et al v. Louis Milusnic et al
as 2:2020cv04450
Plaintiff:
Shawn L. Fears, Felix Samuel Garcia, Yonnedil Carror Torres and others
Defendant:
Michael Carvajal and Louis Milusnic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mr. Izea Reed v. State of California
as 2:2020cv01077
Respondent:
State of California
Petitioner:
Mr. Izea Reed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Antoine Reed v. Patrick Covello
as 2:2020cv00225
Petitioner:
Antoine Reed
Respondent:
Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
