Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Kenneth O. Underwood v. Security Guard and Biltmore Grand Hotel et al
as 2:2023cv05834
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D. Underwood
Defendant:
Security Guard and Biltmore Grand Hotel and Unknown Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jason Latrell Thomas v. G. Marhsall et al
as 2:2022cv05446
Plaintiff:
Jason Latrell Thomas
Defendant:
G. Marshall, J. Villa, G. Ortega and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tielman Richard Lindsay v. Fontana Police Department et al
as 5:2022cv01356
Plaintiff:
Tielman Richard Lindsay and Howell
Defendant:
Fontana Police Department, Andrew Hackett, Samuel Saenz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David L. Keys v. United States of America et al
as 5:2021cv01608
Plaintiff:
David L. Keys
Defendant:
United States of America, Unknown Officers, Whole Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joaquin Frazier v. Police Dept Palm Springs et al
as 5:2019cv00143
Respondent:
Police Dept Palm Springs, Jane Does, Sheriff Office Riverside and others
Petitioner:
Joaquin Frazier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Francis Santiago v. Christabel Youssef et al
as 2:2015cv01110
Defendant:
Gerald Blanton, M Chance, David Cheng and others
Plaintiff:
Francis Santiago
Thomas P Vitrano v. D Wong et al
as 5:2014cv02561
Defendant:
H Biagiante, H Biagiante, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas P Vitrano
Kenneth Richard Barber Jr. v. Santa Barbara County et al
as 2:2013cv04645
Defendant:
1 Maintenance Worker, 1 Unknown Psychiatrist, 1 Unknown Psychiatrist and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Richard Barber, Jr.
Demond Mimms v. Four Unknown Officers
as 2:2011cv10305
Defendant:
Four Unknown Officers
Plaintiff:
Demond Mimms
Demond Mimms v. Four Unknown Officers et al
as 8:2011cv01323
Defendant:
Wade Costello, Dan Dutcher, Thomas Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Demond Mimms
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
