Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Alvaro Acevedo et al v. Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv07810
Plaintiff:
Alvaro Acevedo, Sergio Adame, Ruben Arce and others
Defendant:
Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC, Interstate Equipment Leasing, LLC, Charles John Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Abel Contreras et al v. XPO Cartage, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv05725
Plaintiff:
Abimael Hernandez, Jose F. Castro, Manuel D. Martinez Mejia and others
Defendant:
XPO Port Services, Inc., XPO Logistics, Inc., XPO Logistics Port Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Aguilar et al v. City of Los Angeles
as 2:2014cv05633
Plaintiff:
Juan Aguilar, Steven Aguilar, III, Mark Allen and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles and Does
Randolph Agard v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2014cv05668
Plaintiff:
Randolph Agard, Deen Alcaraz, Francisco Banuelos and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles and Does
Freddie Ackerley et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2014cv05654
Plaintiff:
Freddie Ackerley, Richard Acosta, Robert Andreno and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles and Does
Cesar Ardon et al v. 3PD Inc et al
as 5:2013cv01758
Defendant:
3PD Inc and Does
Plaintiff:
Cesar Ardon, Alfredo Arechiga, Luis Chavez and others
Brian Adams et al v. Michaels Stores, Inc
as 2:2009cv01939
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lawley, Lorraine Morales, Christina Bartley and others
Defendant:
Michaels Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
California Ironworkers Field Pension Trust et al v. M C and L Reinforcing et al
as 2:2007cv01495
Plaintiff:
California Ironworkers Field Pension Trust, California Ironworkers Field Pension Trust, California Ironworkers Field Welfare Plan and others
Defendant:
M C and L Reinforcing, Larry James Blankenship, Larry James Blankenship and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
