Cases 91 - 100 of 362
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. Barry Saywitz Properties Two, L.P. et al
as 8:2021cv01812
Plaintiff:
United African-Asian Abilities Club, On Behalf Of Itself And Its Members, Jessie James Davis IV and United African-Asian Abilities Club
Defendant:
BARRY SAYWITZ PROPERTIES TWO, L.P., DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, and Does 1 through 10, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. 1939 Wallace, LP et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 8:2021cv01811
Plaintiff:
United African-Asian Abilities Club, On Behalf Of Itself And Its Members, Jessie James Davis IV and United African-Asian Abilities Club
Defendant:
1939 WALLACE, L P, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,, 1939 Wallace, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. UDR Huntington Vista, L.P. et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 8:2021cv01813
Plaintiff:
United African-Asian Abilities Club, On Behalf Of Itself And Its Members, Jessie James Davis IV and United African-Asian Abilities Club
Defendant:
UDR HUNTINGTON VISTA, L.P., DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. Las Brisas Del Mar L.P. et al
as 8:2021cv01814
Plaintiff:
United African-Asian Abilities Club, On Behalf Of Itself And Its Members, Jessie James Davis IV and United African-Asian Abilities Club
Defendant:
LAS BRISAS DEL MAR, L.P., DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. Patrimo Ltd., A California Limited Partnership et al
as 8:2021cv01817
Plaintiff:
United African-Asian Abilities Club and Jessie James Davis IV
Defendant:
Patrimo Ltd., A California Limited Partnership and Does 1 through 10, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. Monrovia et al
as 8:2021cv01815
Plaintiff:
United African-Asian Abilities Club, On Behalf Of Itself And Its Members, Jessie James Davis IV and United African-Asian Abilities Club
Defendant:
MONROVIA, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, and Does 1 through 10, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. 7466 Rosemead Properties, LLC et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 8:2021cv01816
Plaintiff:
United African-Asian Abilities Club, On Behalf Of Itself And Its Members, Jessie James Davis IV and United African-Asian Abilities Club
Defendant:
7466 ROSEMEAD PROPERTIES, LLC, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, and Does 1 through 10, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. Park Center Place Apartments, LP et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 8:2021cv01818
Plaintiff:
United African-Asian Abilities Club and Jessie James Davis IV
Defendant:
Park Center Place Apartments, LP and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. AMIE et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2021cv07774
Plaintiff:
United African-Asian Abilities Club and Jessie James Davis IV
Defendant:
AMIE, Princess Apts., A California General Partnership and Does 1 through 10, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. Reggie Doing et al
as 2:2021cv07776
Plaintiff:
United African-Asian Abilities Club and Jessie James Davis IV
Defendant:
Reggie Doing, Cronin Darty Medard and Does 1 through 10, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.