Cases 121 - 130 of 251
Samuel A. Dubyak v. Ben Curry
as 5:2010cv00647
Respondent:
Ben Curry
Petitioner:
Samuel Allen Dubyak
Sirlasie Curry v. John Marshall
as 2:2010cv02474
Petitioner:
Sirlasie Curry
Respondent:
John Marshall
Jaime Romero v. Ben Curry
as 8:2007cv00985
Warden-CTF:
Ben Curry
Petitioner:
Jaime Romero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
In Re Khaled M. Ahmed
as 2:2009cv07275
In Re Debtor:
Khaled M. Ahmed
Appellant:
United States of America and United States of America
Appellee:
Khaled M. Ahmed and Nancy K Curry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BAP)
Dwain Scales v. Ben Curry
as 2:2009cv06996
Petitioner:
Dwain Scales
Respondent:
Ben Curry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Linda Curry v. Greenpoint Mortgage Funding Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv06546
Plaintiff:
Linda Curry
Defendant:
Greenpoint Mortgage Funding Inc., Capital One Financial Corp, GMAC Financial Services Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Jorge Luis Hernandez v. Ben Curry et al
as 2:2009cv06378
Petitioner:
Jorge Luis Hernandez
Respondent:
Ben Curry, Board of Parole Hearings and Arnold Schewarzenegger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Linda Curry v. Greenpoint Mortgage Funding, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv06129
Plaintiff:
Linda Curry
Defendant:
Greenpoint Mortgage Funding, Inc., Capital One Financial Corp., Does and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Theodore Trujillo v. Ben Curry
as 2:2008cv08644
Respondent:
Ben Curry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James Nelson v. Ben Curry
as 2:2009cv05405
Petitioner:
James Nelson
Respondent:
Ben Curry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
