Cases 11 - 20 of 25
ING Bank FSB v. Anat Arbib et al
as 2:2011cv06930
Plaintiff:
ING Bank FSB
Defendant:
Shaul Arbib, Does I through X, Inclusive, Anat Arbib and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Hicks Park LLP v. ING Bank FSB et al
as 2:2011cv07330
Defendant:
Does and ING Bank FSB
Plaintiff:
Hicks Park LLP
ING Bank FSB v. Abdul Waheed et al
as 2:2011cv06445
Defendant:
Does, Abdul Waheed and Bobbie Waheed
Plaintiff:
ING Bank FSB
ING Bank, FSB v. Ali Sepehri et al
as 2:2011cv00033
Defendant:
Does, Ali Sepehri and Lava Vahdanian Sepehri
Plaintiff:
ING Bank, FSB
Steve Alkana v. ING Bank FSB et al
as 2:2010cv04079
Counter Defendant:
Michele Alkana and Steve Alkana
Plaintiff:
Steve Alkana
Defendant:
Cal-Western Reconveyance Corporation, Does and ING Bank FSB
Counter Claimant:
ING Bank FSB
ING Bank, fsb v. Alexander Nikolaychuk et al
as 2:2010cv01402
Defendant:
Larisa Ermolova, Fidelity National Financial, Inc., Kinecta Federal Credit Union and others
Plaintiff:
ING Bank, fsb
Li Le v. ING Bank FSB et al
as 5:2010cv00157
Defendant:
Does and ING Bank FSB
Counter Claimant:
ING Bank FSB
213) 612-0373 (fax:
ING Bank, fsb
Counter Defendant:
Li Le
Plaintiff:
Li Le
Jacqueline Lee v. ING Bank FSB et al
as 2:2009cv06995
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Lee
Defendant:
ING Bank FSB, Washington Mutual Bank FA, JPMorgan Chase Bank NA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Yanira Osorio Soriano v. ING Bank FSB et al
as 2:2009cv05692
Plaintiff:
Yanira Osorio Soriano
Defendant:
ING Bank FSB, ING Bank FSB and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Notice of Removal - Foreclosure
Nazila Shalom v. ING Direct Insurance Agency, LLC et al
as 2:2009cv05279
Plaintiff:
Nazila Shalom and Nazila Shalom
Defendant:
Does, ING Bank, fsb, ING Bank, fsb and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Type:
Labor
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
