Cases filed in the US District Court for the Central District of California
Cases 31 - 40 of 192
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London Subscribing to Policy No. BHX000952 v. Southern California Edison Company et al
as 2:2020cv00586
Defendant: Southern California Edison Company, DOES 1-50, Inclusive,, The Boeing Company and others
Plaintiff: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Subscribing to Policy No. BHX000952 as subrogees of Angel View LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London Subscribing to Policy No. BHX000907 v. Southern California Edison Company et al
as 2:2020cv00589
Defendant: Southern California Edison Company, The Boeing Company, Edison International and others
Plaintiff: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Subscribing to Policy No. BHX000907 as subrogees of the Leonard Family Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Canopius US Insurance, Inc. v. Southern California Edison Company et al
as 2:2020cv00592
Defendant: Southern California Edison Company, Does 1-50, inclusive, The Boeing Company and others
Plaintiff: Canopius US Insurance, Inc. as subrogee of Anil Guram, Mohammed Abu-Gheida, Elliot Glusker, Tracey Birdsall, Adam Peters and Brian and Peggy Moreno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Subscribing to Policy Nos. LSI 200432 AND LSI 300125 as subrogees of Timothy and Joanna McPartlin and Makan Delrahim v. Southern California Edison Company et al
as 2:2020cv00597
Defendant: Southern California Edison Company, The Boeing Company, Edison International and others
Plaintiff: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Subscribing to Policy Nos. LSI 200432 AND LSI 300125 as subrogees of Timothy and Joanna McPartlin and Makan Delrahim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London Subscribing to Policy No. LSI 300086-01 v. Southern California Edison Company et al
as 2:2020cv00603
Defendant: Southern California Edison Company, DOES 1 through 50, inclusive., The Boeing Company and others
Plaintiff: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Subscribing to Policy No. LSI 300086-01 as subrogees of Naseem Ahmed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Great Lakes Insurance SE et al v. Southern California Edison Company et al
as 2:2020cv00606
Defendant: DOES 1-50, Inclusive,, The Boeing Company, Southern California Edison Company, - and others
Plaintiff: Great Lakes Insurance SE and Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Subscribing to Policy Nos. BQS001024B AND BQS001016C as subrogees of STK and Sons, LLC and EB33740, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Gary Kast et al v. Southern California Edison Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv10091
Defendant: Southern California Edison Company, Edison International, DOES 1-100 and others
Plaintiff: Gary Kast, Monique Quigley and Zev Kast
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Michael Saida v. The Boeing Company, et al
as 2:2019cv09867
Defendant: Does 1-20, inclusive and The Boeing Company
Plaintiff: Michael Saida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
George Kruse et al v. Actuant Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv09540
Defendant: OSRAM SYLVANIA, INC. (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to GTE SYLVANIA successor-in-interest to PHILCO-FORD), HARCOSEMCO LLC (sued individually and as successor-by-merger to HARCO LLC f/k/a HARCO LABORATORIES, INCORPORATED), LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION d/b/a LOCKHEED MARTIN AERONAUTICS (sued individually and as successor-by-merger to MARTIN MARIETTA) and others
Plaintiff: George Kruse and Shigeko Kruse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
Gary Field v. Aetna Life Insurance Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv09346
Defendant: Aetna Life Insurance Company, The Boeing Company c/o Aetna and The Boeing Company
Plaintiff: Gary Field
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?