Cases 51 - 60 of 94
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv09369
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cassandra Rodgers v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation dba Amtrak et al
as 5:2015cv01967
Defendant:
DOES, National Railroad Passenger Corporation and Diane Pitts
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Rodgers
Elias Munoz v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv06309
Defendant:
Does and National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Plaintiff:
Elias Munoz
Li Wang et al v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv05848
Defendant:
California Coastal Conservancy, California Department of Fish and Game, California Department of Transportation and others
Plaintiff:
Li Wang, Hui Xiao, Yuzhou Xu and others
Richard Kelley v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv05614
Defendant:
Amtrak, Does and National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Plaintiff:
Richard Kelley
Frances Richard v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv05536
Defendant:
Does and National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Plaintiff:
Frances Richard
Robert K. Heldenbrand v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 5:2014cv02576
Plaintiff:
Robert K. Heldenbrand
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Aquelina Farias v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, et al.
as 8:2015cv00633
Defendant:
County of Orange, Does, John Hernandez and others
Plaintiff:
Aquelina Farias
Kittipong Ratanachan v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv02293
Defendant:
ARAMARK BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC, Does, Enrique Garcia and others
Plaintiff:
Kittipong Ratanachan
Barry Marchionna v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv02099
Defendant:
Does, Woody Marchionna, National Railroad Passenger Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Barry Marchionna
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
