Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Amber Doe v. Sequoia Capital et al
as 2:2023cv06439
Plaintiff:
Amber Doe
Defendant:
Sequoia Capital, Michael Lewis Goguen, Two Bear Capital and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Eve Doe v. Quinn Emanuel Urquhart and Sullivan LLP et al
as 2:2023cv04896
Plaintiff:
Eve Doe
Defendant:
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart and Sullivan LLP, John Quinn, Diane Doolittle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Jane Doe et al v. Quinn Emanuel Urquhart and Sullivan LLP et al
as 2:2023cv04723
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe and Does 1 through 64
Defendant:
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart and Sullivan LLP, John Quinn, Diane Doolittle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Amber Doe v. Michael Lewis Goguen et al
as 2:2023cv02280
Plaintiff:
Amber Doe
Defendant:
Michael Lewis Goguen, Sequoia Capital, Two Bear Capital and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Berihu Hadera Fkadu v. ASH et al
as 2:2019cv07857
Defendant:
Dewayn, Danielle Paladino, David Peter and others
Plaintiff:
Berihu Hadera Fkadu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berihu Fkadu v. Sterling C. Price et al
as 2:2017cv04658
Respondent:
Chand, Dawn Donovan, Mr. Mason M. Nutter and others
Plaintiff:
Berihu H. Fkadu
Franklin Taylor v. C Price et al
as 2:2012cv05506
Defendant:
T. Fiery, Kooper, D. Long and others
Plaintiff:
Franklin Taylor
Frederick K.C. Price v. John Stossel et al
as 2:2008cv03936
Plaintiff:
Frederick K. C. Price, Frederick K. C. Price, Frederick K. C. Price and others
Defendant:
John Stossel, John Stossel, John Stossel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Frederick KC Price v. John Stossel et al
as 2:2007cv06015
Plaintiff:
Frederick K C Price and Frederick K C Price
Defendant:
John Stossel, John Stossel, John Stossel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
